The Dairy Crest Group Essay


Dairy Crest Group plc is known as one of the largest United Kingdom-based dairy companies engaged in procurance, production and bringing liquid milk and associated merchandises throughout the United Kingdom and Europe. The Group is in changeless competition with other dairy providers such as Robert Wiseman Dairies and Arla. This analysis compares Dairy Crest Group with the possible rival Robert Wiseman Dairies in gross revenues, company ratings and fiscal public presentation and place, besides includes the company description, profitableness analysis, efficiency analysis, and fiscal strength analysis.

Company Description Dairy Crest Group PLC

Dairy Crest Group plc is a United Kingdom-based dairy company engaged in fabrication and trading liquid milk and dairy merchandises in the UK and Europe. In recent old ages, the Group made some concern acquisitions and disposals to bring forth growing every bit good as constructing the taking places in the market. In 2006, Dairy Crest acquired the Express Dairies Depot operations and Arla ‘s Liverpool and Nottingham dairies. In 2008, the Company acquired certain assets from the East of England Co-operative Society. By these acquisitions Dairy Crest ensured the taking participant of dairy concern in the southern England, South Wales and East Anglia. The Group gets a important development in the past five old ages. The charts and tabular arraies below show inside informations about the company ‘s five twelvemonth development.

Competitor ‘s Description Robert Wiseman Dairies PLC

The Wiseman ‘s chief activity is treating and administering milk and associated merchandises. With the money raised from the floatation, it has expanded its concern with multiple retail merchants in recent old ages every bit good as acquisitions of Kennerty Farm Dairies ( 1995 ) and Milklink ‘s fresh liquid milk concern ( 2006 ) . Now the company employs in surplus of 4500 staff across 7 dairies and 15 distribution terminals throughout the UK. Although still based in Scotland, gross revenues in England now account for more than 66 % of the entire gross revenues. Doorstep bringings continue to worsen ensuing in an addition in gross revenues in retail merchants. In 2008, a trade with a Spanish distributer to provide fresh milk in that state was agreed.

Gross saless Analysis

Dairy Crest Group plc reported gross revenues of? 1647.6 million for the financial twelvemonth stoping March of 2009. This indicates an addition of 4.9 % versus 2008, lending to an addition in nutrient section from? 499.6 million to? 537.3 million and growing in dairy concern from? 1070.1 million to? 1110.3 million. In general, there is a stable increasing tendency in gross revenues from 2004 to 2009.

While Dairy Crest Group and its comparable company Robert Wiseman Dairies experienced growing in gross revenues in 2009, the 4.9 % addition at Dairy Crest Group is non every bit important as Robert Wiseman Dairies ( which experienced growing of 17.4 % ) . However, Dairy Crest Group presently has 8,122 employees, with gross revenues of? 1647.6 million, this equates to gross revenues of? 202.85 per employee. This is reasonably close to Robert Wiseman Dairies, which had gross revenues? 188.04 per employee.

Company Valuation Analysis

The Group ‘s net incomes per portion are lower than that achieved during the last financial twelvemonth of the company, which ended in March of 2008, when the company reported net incomes of 51.7 per portion. Net incomes per portion fell 13 % in 2009 from 2008. However, the comparable company besides experienced losingss by 65.7 % to 9.19 per portion ( 2008 27.76 per portion ) , which represents that Robert Wiseman Dairies suffers a larger loss than Dairy Crest Group because of the difficult economic status.

Dairy Crest Group paid dividends numbering 20.1 per portion and dividend output of 2.60 % , which is the lowest figure in the past four old ages. Although the Company reported losingss of 25 % , the company will return to profitableness shortly. The decrease of dividend is merely proposed by direction as a last resort other than indicants of losing money. Both the P/E ratio and Payout ratio of Dairy Crest Group is lower than those of Robert Wiseman Dairies and the industry. From this point of position, Wiseman additions more market ‘s assurance and outlooks of growing in the hereafter. The consequences are consistent with the public presentation of five-year mean dividend output and dividend output growing rate of the five old ages.

Efficiency Analysis

There is an addition in inventory transition period of Dairy Group from March 2008, when the company had merely 37.09 yearss of gross revenues in stock list. The 48.81 yearss in stock list is higher than that of Wiseman which had stock lists 4.55 yearss gross revenues at the terminal of 2009. This indicates that Robert Wiseman Dairies can rapidly sell its stock list, while Dairy Crest Group can non sell its stock list really good. On the other manus, the higher stock list ratio besides suggests that the company may be maintaining excessively small stock list, which could do lost net incomes conversely.

In general, if a company gives one month ‘s recognition so, it should roll up its debts within 45 yearss. Debtor Collection periods of both companies are beyond 45 yearss ( 13.42 yearss and 14.81 yearss severally ) . That means they can rapidly change over the house ‘s outstanding debitors into hard currency.

Dairy ‘s creditor deferral period is shorter which represents the company gets better recognition footings from providers. Conversely, Wiseman ‘s late and slow payments will take higher hazards for losing providers or good will. This phenomenon is besides represented in the hard currency transition rhythm.

Dairy Crest Group ‘s CCC ( hard currency transition period ) is acceptable, which is 48.95 yearss. It represents the less clip of the capital of the company is tired up in the concern, which is good to the company ‘s underside line. While its rival Wiseman has a negative CCC which is conspicuously ensuing from collectingmoney fromcustomersprior topayingsuppliers, which indicates that Wiseman did non pay dairy providers until it received payment for selling the merchandises.

Profitableness Analysis

First, Dairy Crest Group ‘s 2009 gross net income border is somewhat lower than the company achieved in 2008 and 2007, when gross net income border is equal to 27.92 % and 30.6 % . However, the company ‘s 2009 gross net income border of 27.06 % was better than the comparable company which had gross net incomes 21.28 % of gross revenues in 2009.

Second, the company ‘s operating net income was? 128.84 million, or 7.82 % of gross revenues. This EBITDA border is worse than the company achieved in 2008, when the EBITDA border was equal to 7.97 % of gross revenues. The Robert Wiseman Dairies had EBITDA border that was less ( 7.07 % ) than that achieved by Dairy Crest Group. However, Wiseman had a more stable EBITDA border than Dairy Group from 2005 to 2009.

Third, there is an addition in ROSF, ROCE, and ROTA of Dairy Group from March 2008. The return on stockholders ‘ fund is higher than that of Wiseman which is equal to 22.87 % at the terminal of 2009. It is consistent with the return on entire assets and return on capital employed, which represent Dairy has more profitable and efficient direction stockholders ‘ investing in assets and bring forth more net incomes than Wiseman. Harmonizing to 5 old ages mean ROE and ROTA, Dairy has a higher ratio in ROE while a lower ratio in ROTA than Wiseman. Furthermore, both of the company ‘s ROE and ROTA are higher than those of the industry.

Fiscal Strength Analysis

The fiscal wellness of Dairy Crest Group is better than that of Robert Wiseman Dairies because both liquidness ratio and current ratio of Dairy is higher than that of Wiseman. It indicates that Dairy has fewer jobs with liquidness comparatively. However, the liquidness of both companies is lower than that of industry. Furthermore, the current ratios of Wiseman in the five old ages are ever under one, proposing the company wouldbeunable to pay offits short-run duties with its most liquid assets.

Furthermore, there is a important increasing tendency of Dairy Group ‘s pitching ratio in the last five old ages. Particularly from March 2008, pitching ratio additions from 152.22 % to 206.44 % . The ratio is much higher than that of its compared company Wiseman, whose geartrain is equal to 49.62 % in 2009. The higher the geartrain, the more vulnerable the company is to increasing involvement rates. Most investors will decline farther finance when company ‘s geartrain exceeds 50 per cent. The higher geartrain of Group make against bring forthing investors fund in the hereafter.


Despite the ambitious economic environment in the last twelvemonth, the Group has experienced the growing of 5 % in gross revenues versus last twelvemonth in malice of the lessening in net income on operations. As a consequence, the gross net income border falls by 3 % last twelvemonth, ensuing in the diminution in net incomes per portion ( lessening by 13 % ) and dividend per portion ( lessening by 10.2 % ) . However, the Group is in better fiscal wellness because fewer liquidness jobs are exist in the company.

To short-run investors, it is advisable to put in Dairy Group because both the growing net income border and return on investing are higher than those of Robert Wiseman Dairies. These are associated with the larger graduated table and capital financess of the Dairy Group. However, the higher geartrain ratio and lower payout ratio are negative signals for farther investing in the hereafter. To long-run investors, Robert Wiseman Dairies is recommended to put in. But we must remind investors of lower liquidness ratios of Wiseman, which indicates the peril in the portfolio.

Note that some of the fiscal ratios stated within this analysis may be distorted because of gross revenues in funding, renting, etc. , which can falsify certain ratios.