Citizens of the EU Essay

Citizens of the European Union

This paper aims to joint the importance of national and regional individuality within Spain and Italy while supplying an in depth analysis of what it means to be “European” . Identity is dependent on both single picks and the corporate constituents within each state such as linguistic communication, rites and patterns. This essay will concentrate chiefly on Italy and Spain civilizations and how the background of the European individuality can go salient in specific contexts due to the attempts of the European Union ( EU ) . Every twenty-four hours patterns such as linguistic communication usage, information communicating, and the forms of societal contacts are tremendously of import for the reproduction and development of individualities within both Italy and Spain. However the European Union has allowed states to ensemble their shared values and economical aspirations in order to organize a “European Identity” . This European Identity is supported by the European humanistic disciplines, civilizations, and common instructions plans for all the EU members, nevertheless some states may comprehend this as beliing their ain aged individualities that define such as national, regional, spiritual, lingual or ideological.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Bing a citizen of the European Union ( EU ) can hold its advantages and disadvantages harmonizing to the Standard Eurobarometer 77, some outlooks include a good criterion of life and quality of life including economic stableness and fiscal and budgetary support. Harmonizing to a recentEurobarometerstudysix out of 10 Europeans see themselves as citizens of the European Union, in resistance, 38 % of respondents do non experience that they are European citizens.” ( Eurobarometer, 2012 ) . However 91 % of Europeans are strongly attached to their ain state such as Spain and Italy which will be farther discussed. Some advantages of being portion of the EU includes luxuries such as the decrease in boundary line controls when get oning overseas, client rights when purchasing from another European state and the ability and freedom to work and populate in another state. The sense of European individuality is achieved when persons are able to portion cultural elements such as currency and values in order to better societal citizenship. As the above statement reflects, merely 62 % of Europeans experience this manner. Thus Suggestions to better this included a “European response service to contend natural disasters” and the “creation of a consonant EU societal public assistance system” ( Eurobarometer, 2012 ) . David Campbell argues that the national individuality of states should be an instrument in which the provinces can train society and go the mechanism of alteration and the scheme of “difference” ( Campbell, 1992 ) . Therefore when mentioning to the European integrating procedures, the individuality paradigm should be immensely focused on the similarities between the provinces instead than what differences set them apart. The EU was the merchandise of a voluntary and equal association of states, as opposed to a construction that coalesced around a dominant state from old economical and political brotherhoods.

Spain joined the EU in 1986 and has a population of 46 million. The grade of togetherness and efficiency in Spain can be attributed to the sense of national individuality among the population. Therefore it is non surprising that the EU has developed legion different methods in order to instil in European states the sense of national belonging, an illustration of this includes the Maastricht Treaty for the homogenization of national passports across Europe. Various different theories have been developed to research the psychological and societal procedures that are proven to act upon individuality and shapes the attitudes of the state overall. Each person is able to place with legion different sub-categories such as ‘English-speaker’ , ‘Christian’ or ‘Female’ ; therefore it is of import to understand the relationships between each sub-category and their comparative importance towards individuality before reasoning to a peculiar designation. Political battles arise in Spain between both regional and national authoritiess and in the past 15 old ages at that place have been strict developments to Spain’s regional political dealingss in order to let Spain to stand entirely when crisis hits ( Huici et al. , 1997 ) .

Spain was known as the state that lagged behind the remainder of Europe and the European Union economically and sociologically and it bypassed many of Europe great revolutions including the Renaissance, the Enlightment and the Industrial Revolution which subsequently lead to democracy. In such a little clip Spain was transformed dramatically, its political system was democratised and political dealingss were altered. Economically Spain moved from being the poorest states in all of Europe to gaining approx. 80 % of the EU’s mean income. It managed to take a strong incorporate state, that contains two different facets, during the 19Thursday-century they involved the ‘liberal’ and a ‘conservative-traditionalist’ , which competed against each other for the hegemony of the Spanish ideals. However in the 20Thursday-century, these two discourses became the anchors of Spain and its political dealingss, which lead to the fusion of Spain and its beginnings of national individuality. The constructive attack stresses the originative and altering facets of Spain’s national individuality, and allows for diverseness of political contexts and historical transmutations to be accepted among the population.

Italy joined the EU in 1952 and has a population of 60 million. Italy’s individuality is linked to its national spirit that is linked to its historical values, its ain cultural features and manners of idea. When Italians were asked about their foundations the most common reply was the ‘respect for common rules’ ( 25 % ) , ‘moral values’ ( 23 % ) , historical memory ( 8 % ) , faith ( 6 % ) , and ethnicity ( 4 % ) ( Favretto, 2004 ) . In 1961 Italy was really immune to traveling off from its old familial individualities such as the Spanish and Gallic, but subsequently it did and it was really rewarding as it experienced assorted national civilizations and impressions such as the romanticism period where Italy set the foundations of its individuality. However this individuality is closely related to the EU particularly in economical factors, portion of its globalization processes included Salvadori in 2011 ( Giordano, 2002 ) . – Italian individuality is known for its complexness and is progressively expressed by its political history.Some persons and political relations argue that the North of Italy has its ain individuality that different from the Italian civilization ; this is referred to as the “northern question” by a political party by the name of Lega Nord ( LN ) . Many have found this stance really controversial and prejudiced. The LN targeted the North of Italy as it does non hold historical claims such as other European states. The rise of the LN nevertheless has challenged how best to understand the nature of regional and national individualities, what appears to be go oning is a nesting of individualities at complementary degrees instead than a viing one, this is apparent as in Italy for national and regional individualities have existed for legion decennaries. The LN claimed that the Italian civilization is portion of the southern Italy which is really prejudiced and endanger the hereafter of Italy. The chief intent was to contrive an individuality and ethnicity for North of Italy to attach to its political undertaking. This received great media coverage nevertheless the bulk of Italian people viewed the LNs claims approximately sezession as a backwards measure for the state. Naturally the EU has provided some common land for both political and cultural constituents of legion states hence is it necessary sing how the EU is a pudding stone of the people with different state individualities and civilizations. It is best to mention to Italy as the state that allows for coexistence between national and regional civilizations in order to avoid the quandary of puting a specific European individuality in which involves the procedure of negociating the multiple different perceived individualities that Europe consists of. Italy has allows for multicultural to be accepted within its boundary lines in order to turn to the individuality mosaic that reflects the European civilizations. this allows for legion individualities to at the same time be without a hierarchal infliction which reduces the struggle and physiques tolerance within the population.

The impressions of both regional and national individualities are both beef uping to both Italy and Spain as they are positively correlated. The governmental regulation and economic public presentation is important in understanding the importance of Europe as a state and hence it does non act upon Italy or Spain in the same ways. In both states the national involvement as opposed to the European 1s are more outstanding and the effects are manifold. More cognition about the EU and its policies and processs can assist to understand the house servants political processed and their effects for European integrating. As discussed above, identities come at legion different degrees every bit such as local, national, international or regional due to be being a complex construction that is layered with a mosaic individuality that is alone to each person life across Europe. It is apparent throughout this essay that the EU and Europe states are characterised by two opposing tendencies, one which emphasizes importance of national individualities and the right to difference ; and the other that advocates the right for a common individuality and to a cosmopolitan civilization.Word count:1,479


Campbell, D. ( 1992 ) . Writing security: United States foreign policy and the political relations of individuality: Uracil of Minnesota Press.

Eurobarometer, S. ( 2012 ) . 77 ( Spring, 2012 ) . TNS Opinion & A ; Social hypertext transfer protocol: //ec. Europa. eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb77/eb77_value_en. pdf.

Favretto, I. ( 2004 ) . Italy, EU expansion and the ‘reinvention’of Europe between historical memories and present representations. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans Online, 6 ( 2 ) , 161-181.

Giordano, B. ( 2002 ) . The Lega Nord and the Changing Politics of Italian Identity. Paper presented at the Forum for Modern Language Studies.

Huici, C. , Ros, M. , Cano, I. , Hopkins, N. , Emler, N. , & A ; Carmona, M. ( 1997 ) . Comparative individuality and rating of socio-political alteration: Percepts of the European Community as a map of the saliency of regional individualities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27 ( 1 ) , 97-113.

Muro, D. , & A ; Quiroga, A. ( 2005 ) . Spanish patriotism Ethnic or civic? Ethnicities, 5 ( 1 ) , 9-29.

( Muro & A ; Quiroga, 2005 )